For a movement that believes in indigenous churches, we sure do make our missionaries dependent upon the homeland.
Since I started ranting about missionaries in the last entry, I’ll follow that up in this one.
I greatly disapprove of a missionary system that reduces apostles of God to traveling beggars. The Assemblies of God’s belief is a valid one—if God really has called you to minister somewhere, he’ll provide the finances. How that’s supposed to work is that God simply provides the finances: Someone gives you money to get there; a job opens up in the place where you’re sent; locals come to assist you and chip in for expenses; you get favor from the local government… You know, like Barnabas, Paul, Silas, or Priscilla. The ancient system worked. It ain’t broke.
But the way that the Assemblies, and many an Assemblies missionary, puts this concept into practice is by going to church after church and preaching a missions sermon for money. It’s the equivalent of a freakin’ street performer. God called them to minister, not to be dancing monkeys. The idea of “furlough” is also one I disapprove of. I can understand a brief vacation—a few weeks to visit family and friends, relax, unwind, etc. Instead I have known missionaries who have spent up to a year in the States, begging for financial and prayer support, when they should be in their adoptive homelands, ministering. They should not be forced to visit us; we should be visiting (and assisting) them.